The acquisition of sophisticated spyware by governments is a recurring theme in the 21st century, raising serious concerns about privacy, human rights, and the potential for abuse. Poland's alleged purchase of the "Hermes Szpiegowski" (Hermes Spy) system in the spring of 2021, as reported by *Gazeta Wyborcza*, throws the country into the spotlight, adding another layer to the already complex narrative surrounding state-sponsored surveillance. The system, reportedly costing 15 million złoty (approximately €3.3 million), is described as even more advanced than the infamous Pegasus spyware, igniting a firestorm of debate and demanding a thorough investigation.
The *Gazeta Wyborcza* report, which initiated the public discussion, claimed that the National Prosecutor's Office (Prokuratura Krajowa) purchased Hermes in the spring of 2021. The article immediately drew parallels to the Pegasus spyware scandal, which has plagued numerous countries, revealing widespread instances of government-sanctioned surveillance targeting journalists, activists, and opposition figures. The alleged superior capabilities of Hermes, compared to Pegasus, only heightened concerns about the potential scope and impact of its deployment. The comparison to Pegasus, already a notorious symbol of unchecked state surveillance, immediately framed the Hermes acquisition as a grave threat to fundamental rights and freedoms in Poland. The phrase "Pegasus bis" – Pegasus 2 – quickly entered the public discourse, highlighting the perceived escalation of the surveillance capabilities at the disposal of the Polish authorities.
The immediate reaction from the then-Prokurator Krajowy, Bogdan Święczkowski, was a flat denial. He categorically rejected the allegations, stating that no spyware was purchased during his tenure. This denial, however, did little to quell the growing controversy. The lack of transparency surrounding the procurement process, coupled with the significant financial outlay, fueled skepticism and demanded further scrutiny. The absence of any public explanation regarding the purpose of the alleged purchase added to the public's distrust. Was it intended for combating organized crime? Or was it designed for a more sinister purpose, targeting political opponents or dissidents? These questions remain largely unanswered, leaving a vacuum filled with speculation and suspicion.
The "Hermes, lepszy Pegasus?" (Hermes, better than Pegasus?) headline in various Polish media outlets encapsulates the core of the public concern. The implication of a more advanced system than Pegasus, already infamous for its invasive capabilities, suggests a potentially far-reaching surveillance apparatus capable of accessing an individual's personal data, communications, and location with unprecedented ease and sophistication. The implications for privacy and freedom of expression are deeply troubling.
The incident highlights several crucial issues regarding government surveillance and democratic accountability. Firstly, the lack of transparency surrounding the procurement of Hermes raises serious concerns about the potential for abuse. The absence of public debate and oversight creates an environment where such powerful tools can be deployed without sufficient scrutiny or accountability. The public deserves to know what systems the government possesses, how they are used, and under what legal framework they operate. The secrecy surrounding the Hermes purchase directly undermines the principles of transparency and democratic governance.
current url：https://jnvudy.c368n.com/blog/hermes-szpiegowski-83114